Another Mirena Miscarriage and Ectopic Pregnancy


. By
 
Long Island, NY: “I can’t believe that the Mirena IUD is still on the market,” says Tara. “There is no way that Bayer cannot know their birth control device is causing so many miscarriages - obviously they choose profit over patient safety.”

Another Mirena Miscarriage and Ectopic PregnancyTara had the Mirena implanted two years ago after her son was born. Interestingly, in this document to Bayer from the Food and Drug Administration, the Mirena maker says that “Mirena is recommended for women who have had at least one child.” Tara is so thankful she has a child because at this point she thinks that infertility is one of Mirena birth control side effects.

“Bayer Mirena warnings should include infertility,” says Tara, 28 years old. It would seem that the FDA would agree by issuing the following statement in January 2010:

“The risk presentation omits the contraindications regarding untreated lower genital tract infections and conditions associated with increased susceptibility to pelvic infections, and does not adequately convey that should a woman become pregnant while using Mirena, she may lose her baby or her fertility.”

Rather than remove Mirena from the market, however, Bayer was requested (in the same document as above) by the FDA to cease using certain promotional materials, i.e., “Mirena may help couples keep life simple” and that Mirena will “help you be more intimate” with your partner.

For women like Tara, these statements by Bayer are nothing short of outrageous, and she is appalled that the FDA has not recalled Mirena.

“When I had the Mirena removed, my doctor had a hard time finding it because it had become embedded in my fallopian tube,” says Tara. “It was so painful, and my gynecologist (I have since changed to another doctor) didn’t give me any advice on what to do or what not to do. About two months later, I became pregnant but miscarried at eight weeks.”

Tara asked her doctor how this could have happened - she was young and healthy and had never miscarried before. Her gynecologist told her that she should have waited at least six months after the Mirena was removed so that her body could heal and get her hormones back to the right levels.

“He told me that I would have miscarried before 12 weeks because my uterus wasn’t strong enough to hold the child,” says Tara, crying. “I had to go to the hospital and get a D & C. I was heartbroken and depressed.” Add to that another emotion: she was soon to become furious.

“My husband and I decided to wait, and in August, I found out that I was seven weeks pregnant,” Tara says. “My new gynecologist had been vigilantly checking my hormone levels, and at the beginning of September, I had a sonogram. The technician asked me if I was pregnant, which I found odd. She had to do an internal sonogram and found that the baby was in my fallopian tube - an ectopic pregnancy. She gave her condolences and then my gynecologist, visibly upset, told me it was so unexpected.”

There was nothing they could do; an ectopic pregnancy can be life threatening. Tara had her tube and ovary removed - the tube where the Mirena had become embedded months ago.

“My doctor says that I can try to have another baby but I don’t know if I want to go through this again,” Tara explains. “If I knew that Mirena can cause miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies, I would never have had this IUD. Honestly, I don’t know if this has affected my fertility; I don’t know if I can have any more kids. As well, I was out of work for so long and now I am out of work again and cannot yet lift my son from the surgery. Mirena has caused so much pain on so many levels: physically, emotionally and even financially.”

The Mayo Clinic lists Mirena side effects and explains that if you do conceive while using Mirena, you’re at higher risk of an ectopic pregnancy - when the fertilized egg implants outside the uterus, usually in a fallopian tube. It does not go so far to say that Mirena can cause an ectopic pregnancy after it has been removed.

One of the most common Mirena Coil side effects is yeast infection. Have you read this? "Yeast Infection No More" by Linda Allen. Linda is an author, researcher, nutritionist and health consultant who dedicated her life to creating the ultimate holistic yeast infection solution guaranteed to permanently cure the root of Candida and dramatically improve the overall quality of your life, naturally, without the use prescription medication and without any side effects. Learn more by visiting her website YeastInfectionNoMore.com

Growing Number of Lawsuits Allege Injuries From Mirena Side Effects

 
 
New York, NY (PRWEB) October 05, 2013

The birth control center at DrugNews.net is alerting women using the Mirena IUD contraceptive device of new information on the site. A federal judicial panel has released updated court records showing the number of lawsuits alleging the devices caused perforation injuries has risen over 29% in less than a month.

The DrugNews Center was created to improve patient safety by giving those using popular prescription drugs or medical devices access to the latest safety alerts, recalls, studies and legal news. Visitors can see if others are experiencing similar side effects and decide if they need legal advice.

The resource center contains warnings from health experts about possible injury from Mirena IUDs. The FDA has previously advised that patients can suffer perforation of reproductive organs during device implantation.

DrugNews has also added a study from the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons which warns Mirena IUDs can become dislodged and perforate the uterine wall after installation. FDA records show the agency has received 70,072 reports of Mirena side effects, with as many as 6,000 involving device dislocation or uterus perforation.

Due to the number of patients filing a Mirena lawsuit, federal cases have been consolidated to a special multi-district litigation court in New York (In Re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434, Southern District New York).

Now, the latest court records show the number of cases being filed has increased over 29% in the past month, from 123 on August 15th to 159 on September 11th*. Judge Seibel, who is overseeing the federal litigation, has ordered parties to select test cases by April 4, 2014.

Anyone who suffered perforation or required surgery while using a Mirena IUD is urged to speak with a lawyer about their legal options. However, DrugNews only recommends lawyers who are already handling Mirena lawsuits.

For more information on the research, side effects and litigation news related to Mirena or other birth control devices, or to speak with a lawyer, visit http://www.DrugNews.net.


One of the most common Mirena Coil side effects is yeast infection. Have you read this? "Yeast Infection No More" by Linda Allen. Linda is an author, researcher, nutritionist and health consultant who dedicated her life to creating the ultimate holistic yeast infection solution guaranteed to permanently cure the root of Candida and dramatically improve the overall quality of your life, naturally, without the use prescription medication and without any side effects. Learn more by visiting her website YeastInfectionNoMore.com

Mirena IUD Not Designed to Travel Inside the Body

Washington, DC: With some two million women in the US using Mirena birth control, it’s little wonder there are so many reports of Mirena birth control side effects. What’s more, such incidence of Mirena migration and other adverse events could be on the rise, given an expanded availability and affordability of Mirena birth control through the auspices of the Affordable Care Act.

The Mirena IUD, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000, is inserted by a physician and is designed to provide birth control for a period of five years. The device releases a daily dose of progestin levonorgestrel. The T-shaped device is placed at a certain position for optimum performance. The device is also intended to stay put.

But it often doesn’t, as many Mirena plaintiffs suing manufacturer Bayer over Mirena side effects, can attest. The device has been known to migrate away from the placement point, which can not only affect the effectiveness of birth control, but also negatively impact the woman’s health.

According to Lawyers Weekly USA (4/5/13), the Mirena IUD has been found in some cases to migrate from the insertion point as far away as the rib cage. Mirena uterine perforation has also been reported. Two strings that hang from the bottom of the T-shaped device, designed to allow the attending physician to verify the correct placement of the device, have been found in some cases to wrap around and constrict organs when the device migrates, requiring surgical removal.

Some women have discovered their Mirena IUD has migrated years after insertion. For others, it can be just weeks or months. In the case of one Mirena plaintiff, the alleged migration of her Mirena birth control occurred after only a few days.


The plaintiff, Susan Harp, alleges in her Mirena IUD lawsuit that just days after receiving her IUD she felt intense abdominal pain and succumbed to frequent vomiting. Upon examination with the aid of a CT scan, it was determined her IUD was no longer in her uterus at all but was found to be moving freely within her pelvis.

The device required removal, a process that was reportedly complicated by a kidney infection.

Plaintiffs and their lawyers have taken exception to Bayer Mirena warnings, which are alleged to be lax. For example, according to one plaintiff attorney, the product label for Mirena references the potential risk for Mirena uterine perforation during insertion, but not afterwards.

According to the report there were no fewer than 25,000 adverse event reports citing various Mirena birth control side effects as of 2010, the 10th anniversary of the introduction of Mirena IUD to the market. Lawyers expect Mirena to be a very large tort.

One of the most common Mirena Coil side effects is yeast infection. Have you read this? "Yeast Infection No More" by Linda Allen. Linda is an author, researcher, nutritionist and health consultant who dedicated her life to creating the ultimate holistic yeast infection solution guaranteed to permanently cure the root of Candida and dramatically improve the overall quality of your life, naturally, without the use prescription medication and without any side effects. Learn more by visiting her website YeastInfectionNoMore.com

“Mirena Fragments Almost Killed Me”, Says Victim

West Palm Beach, FL: Candance has experienced a slew of Mirena birth control side effects since she had the IUD implanted in 2007, from cramping and bleeding to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Candance, and her doctor, thought she had it removed, but a fragment remained.

“Mirena Fragments Almost Killed Me”, Says VictimBecause she had so much cramping and bleeding, Candance had the Mirena IUD (intrauterine device) removed just three months after it was implanted. But more severe Mirena side effects were in store. “It started with my blood pressure going through the roof and several bacterial infections,” says Candance. “By 2009, my body was so out of whack that my doctor ordered a CT Scan, MRI and ultrasound - the latter showed a piece of Mirena the size of my fingertip still in my body; it was embedded into my uterine wall.

“My OB/GYN tried to remove it, but when I woke from surgery, he told me that they couldn’t find it and I had a D&C. I was back in the hospital about a year later with my blood pressure soaring again. I had every test in the book. Finally in 2012, my body said ‘enough is enough.’ I thought I had a flu virus; I was lethargic and throwing up constantly so I went back to ER. They gave me some meds for the flu and sent me home, but I continued to throw up. Next day I went back to the hospital - turns out that I had been throwing up blood for two days.”

This time Candance was admitted and a gastroenterologist performed an endoscopy - a procedure that allows a doctor to look inside your body with a tiny camera. They found ulcers, but not the piece of Mirena. Next up Candance was referred to an oncologist who performed another surgery in February 2013 and he was able to remove not one but two small pieces of the Mirena. “Tissue had grown around the Mirena pieces - no wonder it was so hard to find,” she says.

“I was out of the hospital recovering and what would you know - I was bleeding again and bloated and generally feeling lousy. And my blood pressure spiked again.

“Next day I went back to the gastroenterologist who told me to go to ER immediately. I had a cardiologist and two infectious disease doctors look-see and they all consulted with the OB/GYN who took the Mirena out.”

This time Candance was diagnosed with PID, or pelvic inflammatory disease, which can be life-threatening if not treated in time. She was pumped with penicillin every four hours. When she asked her doctors how she could have gotten PID (which is typically a sexually transmitted disease), she discovered that Mirena could have caused it. The Mirena website states that “less than 1 percent of users get a serious infection called pelvic inflammatory disease.” Unfortunately, Candance was that one percent. Now she wants answers to some serious questions.

“At what point did this Mirena break inside me? Did it come off when it was implanted or when it was removed? I wonder how many women have had this same thing happen to them.”

She is now on a second round of antibiotics and after that another endoscopy and colonoscopy to make sure the disease hasn’t moved anywhere else. “I have lost so much because I have spent so much time in hospital,” Candance explains. “I lost my job and I lost my fiancĂ©. And I know that I will have stomach issues up next. And this is the icing on the cake: they just found a cyst caused by the PID - I am not done with this yet.

“I have e-mailed everyone from the Supreme Court judges to health care providers to LawyersandSettlements and everyone who said the Mirena is safe. How can Bayer stand behind its product?”

One of the most common Mirena Coil side effects is yeast infection. Have you read this? "Yeast Infection No More" by Linda Allen. Linda is an author, researcher, nutritionist and health consultant who dedicated her life to creating the ultimate holistic yeast infection solution guaranteed to permanently cure the root of Candida and dramatically improve the overall quality of your life, naturally, without the use prescription medication and without any side effects. Learn more by visiting her website YeastInfectionNoMore.com

New Case Study Highlights Risks of Mirena Side Effects

Wilma Tucker | March 15th, 2013 | Posted in Mirena Lawsuits
 
A recent case study involving Mirena side effects highlights the risks associated with this method of contraception. A 26-year old woman had to have the intrauterine device (IUD) removed from her abdomen after she discovered she was 12 weeks pregnant. The device had migrated outside the uterus, where it remained undetected for a number of years.


Misdiagnosis made due to migration of the device
 
The woman had the device inserted into her uterus nearly four years prior to the pregnancy. After the IUD was implanted, the woman realized the guide strings that indicate the device is in the proper place went missing. Her physician performed an ultrasound, but could was unable to find the Mirena IUD inside her uterus. It was then determined that the device must have fallen out of the woman’s body.
 
Unfortunately, a Mirena uterine perforation had occurred instead, and the device had migrated to another area of the woman’s abdomen. The device went undetected for a number of years, until abdominal pain brought the woman back to her doctor’s office. At this point, the woman had a viable uterine pregnancy, and the decision was made to remove the device surgically to prevent further Mirena side effects and pregnancy complications.

Risk of Mirena uterine perforation higher than indicated

Although the procedure was successful in this case study, even the physicians performing the procedure questioned their decision to remove the device during the woman’s pregnancy. Removal of the IUD carried its own risks, but doctors were also concerned that leaving the device in situ could result in infection or organ injury. Removal could prohibit risks to the fetus and mother from hormones released by the IUD during pregnancy and lower the risk of a septic pregnancy or miscarriage.
 
Despite the risks, doctors treating the patient had no way of knowing for sure if the IUD would actually result in any unwanted side effects during pregnancy. There were also risks involved with the surgery to remove the device, particularly in light of the patient’s current condition. Even after the procedure, doctors involved continue to question whether surgical removal was the most prudent decision at that time.

Mirena IUD injuries not uncommon

This is not the first complication involving a Mirena IUD. The device was approved by the FDA in 2000 as a means of contraception that could last for up to five years. However, reports of Mirena side effects, including migration of the device outside the uterus have been received by the FDA. In some cases, the migration occurred long after the device was inserted, despite product packaging that suggests most migrations occurred during the insertion process.
 
If the IUD migrates outside of the uterus, the woman can experience pain, infection and damage to surrounding organs. The device must be located using ultrasound technology and then surgically removed. Surgical procedures carry their own risks, including infection, pain and organ damage. Some women who have experienced these side effects have been unable to have biological children after the device was removed.
 
Women who become pregnant while the Mirena IUD is inserted face additional risks during pregnancy, including a septic pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage. Ectopic pregnancies occur when the fertilized egg begins development in an area other than the uterus, such as the Fallopian tube. A fetus cannot survive in the case of an ectopic pregnancy, and if the condition is not promptly diagnosed and treated, it can be dangerous for the mother as well. The rate of ectopic pregnancies in women with the Mirena IUD may be as high as 50 percent.
 
Today, injured women are bringing their claims against manufacturer Bayer to courtrooms across the country. These women are alleging Bayer downplayed the potential risk of Mirena uterine perforation while overstating product safety and benefits. Women are seeking compensation from Bayer for medical bills, pain and suffering and lost wages.

One of the most common Mirena Coil side effects is yeast infection. Have you read this? "Yeast Infection No More" by Linda Allen. Linda is an author, researcher, nutritionist and health consultant who dedicated her life to creating the ultimate holistic yeast infection solution guaranteed to permanently cure the root of Candida and dramatically improve the overall quality of your life, naturally, without the use prescription medication and without any side effects. Learn more by visiting her website YeastInfectionNoMore.com

New York Plaintiff Files Mirena IUD Lawsuit

A new Mirena IUD lawsuit was filed on February 21, 2013 against Bayer Pharmaceuticals. The case is currently proceeding in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs, Julie Cantor Miller and Jonathan Miller, allege significant Mirena IUD side effects. The plaintiff was diagnosed with uterine perforation.

Mirena, which was designed and manufactured by Bayer, is a hormonal intrauterine device (IUD) that is intended to provide long-term birth control. It is a small, T-shaped plastic device that a doctor inserts into a woman’s uterus. It works by releasing a synthetic progestogen, a hormone, in order to thicken the cervical mucus and inhibit ovulation. Mirena was first approved by the FDA in 2000, and has since been used by more than 15 million women. However, a growing number of adverse events have been reported by women using the device.

Plaintiff suffers alleged Mirena uterine perforation

On June 26, 2009, Julie Cantor’s physician inserted the Mirena IUD, and at that time, no indications were given that anything was medically wrong. However, on April 21, 2011, the plaintiff learned that she had suffered a uterine perforation as an alleged result of the device. Laparoscopic surgery, which was conducted on May 18, 2011, was needed to remove the IUD, which had migrated outside the uterine cavity.

According to the Mirena IUD lawsuit complaint, the plaintiff has suffered significant pain and suffering, along with severe physical injuries that are expected to be permanent. The plaintiff also cites significant emotional trauma. The complaint notes that the plaintiff could be at risk for additional side effects that have been cited by other complainants.

Some of these possible Mirena side effects could include:

  • Ectopic pregnancy
  • Intrauterine pregnancy
  • Cysts
  • Fetal injury/death
  • Premature menopause
  • Cancer
  • Adhesions
  • Embedment of the IUD

Mirena IUD side effects may warrant MDL

In January 2013, a motion for consolidation of Mirena lawsuits was filed with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML). The motion requested the formation of a Mirena multidistrict litigation (MDL), which is a way to centralize proceedings and group together lawsuits with commonalities. For example, the proposed MDL might possibly group together lawsuits that allege uterine perforation as a result of Mirena.

An MDL serves to streamline the pre-trial process and conserve resources. When a plaintiff joins an MDL, that party retains the right to an individual trial. The JPML is scheduled to hear arguments regarding the proposed MDL on March 21, 2013.

Mirena IUD lawsuit alleges negligence

The complaint filed by lawyers for Julie Miller alleges that Bayer knew of defects in the product, but failed to adequately warn patients and doctors about the risks. The complaint further alleges that the product fails to meet established performance standards, contains false or misleading labeling, and does not provide adequate instructions for insertion of the device. The complaint also alleges that the defendant failed to adequately test the device to determine safety prior to marketing.

Pursuant to these allegations, the plaintiff is seeking compensatory damages for medical expenses, loss of earning capacity, and pain and suffering. Julie Miller’s husband, Jonathan Miller, is also a plaintiff, and cites loss of consortium. The plaintiffs have also requested punitive damages.

One of the most common Mirena Coil side effects is yeast infection. Have you read this? "Yeast Infection No More" by Linda Allen. Linda is an author, researcher, nutritionist and health consultant who dedicated her life to creating the ultimate holistic yeast infection solution guaranteed to permanently cure the root of Candida and dramatically improve the overall quality of your life, naturally, without the use prescription medication and without any side effects. Learn more by visiting her website YeastInfectionNoMore.com